An independent publication documenting what Polsia claims, when, and where. No opinions. No fabrication. Just facts next to each other.
In the past six months, one company made at least seven distinct revenue claims across LinkedIn, Twitter, podcast interviews, blog posts, and a live dashboard.
Each claim is verifiable. Each claim is different. No independent auditor has confirmed any of them.
Our thesis: When a company claims a revenue number, it's a fact. When it claims seven different revenue numbers in six months, it's a story. We're here to print that story.
$49/mo × 7,600 companies = $372K/mo = $4.5M ARR from subscriptions alone. To reach $10M ARR requires $5.5M more from revenue share and ad spend — on companies that are themselves making little to no money.
None of these firms has published independent verification of Polsia's revenue claims. True Ventures removed the "$3M ARR / 3,000 companies" figure from its blog after publication — the page now reads differently than when it was live. None of the VCs have issued corrections or clarifications.
The due diligence process included Polsia's AI running the data room autonomously. Polsia told investors their own AI was answering due diligence questions. No human asked why seven different revenue numbers existed.
Presented to the VC Firm That Wired $30M Based on Self-Reported, Unaudited, Contradicting Revenue Figures — Without Asking a Single Hard Question